<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Laughing Squid - Latest Comments in http://laughingsquid.com/santarchy-now-with-blog/</title><link>http://laughingsquid.disqus.com/</link><description>a resource for art, culture and technology</description><atom:link href="https://laughingsquid.disqus.com/thread_556/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:39:10 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: http://laughingsquid.com/santarchy-now-with-blog/</title><link>http://laughingsquid.com/santarchy-now-with-blog/#comment-1805453</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There's a link under the 2005 Santarchy pics for Pittsburgh (&lt;a href="http://iheartpgh.com/?p=119)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://iheartpgh.com/?p=119)"&gt;http://iheartpgh.com/?p=119)&lt;/a&gt; that does not contain pics of pittsburgh santarchy.  Instead, it contains a blog entry *about* Pittsburgh santarchy, with a photo stolen from Antarctica santarchy.  It looks like this is nothing more than an attempt to direct people to the owner's website.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Santa</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 15:39:10 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>