http://laughingsquid.disqus.com/a resource for art, culture and technologyenWed, 18 Jun 2008 14:50:16 -0000http://laughingsquid.com/same-sex-marriage-20-in-san-francisco/#comment-1812424<p>I am so proud to live in this city that is making history!<br>Cheers! and congratulations to the new married couples!</p>nousha.comWed, 18 Jun 2008 14:50:16 -0000http://laughingsquid.com/same-sex-marriage-20-in-san-francisco/#comment-1812423<p>I mean this in all seriousness, but why do we have such an issue w/ a man and two or more women getting married (if it's consensual) but we say it's okay for two men and/or two women to get married?</p><p>My point is, if we are allowing marriage to be between:</p><p>-Man + Woman<br>-Man + Man<br>-Woman + Woman</p><p>what's wrong w/ adding:</p><p>-Man + 2 or more Women<br>-Woman + 2 or more Men<br>-2 Men + 2 or more Women<br>-2 Women + 2 or more Men</p><p>I think as long as we are re-defining marriage as between "consensual participants" than it should be open to ALL consensual participants.</p>Jack1134Tue, 17 Jun 2008 19:46:46 -0000