<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Laughing Squid - Latest Comments in R.E.M. Blatantly Rips Off Improv Everywhere</title><link>http://laughingsquid.disqus.com/</link><description>a resource for art, culture and technology</description><atom:link href="https://laughingsquid.disqus.com/rem_blatantly_rips_off_improv_everywhere/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:36:55 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: R.E.M. Blatantly Rips Off Improv Everywhere</title><link>http://laughingsquid.com/rem-blatantly-rips-off-improv-everywhere/#comment-1811493</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I think it's kind of absurd that this group is up-in-arms over credit for an idea that they did not originate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also, if you plan it out ahead of time, it is not improv. They should change the name of the troupe to "mess with people everywhere".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">ed</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 14:36:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: R.E.M. Blatantly Rips Off Improv Everywhere</title><link>http://laughingsquid.com/rem-blatantly-rips-off-improv-everywhere/#comment-1811492</link><description>&lt;p&gt;bobo - I agree, Scott Thill should have though twice before writing his Wired blog post and actually did some fact checking first. In this specific case, a representative from Warner Brother (R.E.M.'s label) has publicly stated that Improv Everywhere was the direct inspiration for the video and in their rush to post the video forgot to give credit.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott Beale</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 11:19:50 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: R.E.M. Blatantly Rips Off Improv Everywhere</title><link>http://laughingsquid.com/rem-blatantly-rips-off-improv-everywhere/#comment-1811491</link><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.wired.com/music/2008/04/rem-removes-big.html" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://blog.wired.com/music/2008/04/rem-removes-big.html"&gt;http://blog.wired.com/music...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;think twice.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">bobo</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 04:50:16 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: R.E.M. Blatantly Rips Off Improv Everywhere</title><link>http://laughingsquid.com/rem-blatantly-rips-off-improv-everywhere/#comment-1811494</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I get why everyone gets in a tizzy when a photo or other creative work is included without permission, but since when did it become necessary for creative works have a list of inspirations?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Surely Improv Everywhere is not the first to have executed a "frozen crowd of people" artwork.  Did IE list their inspirations?  No.  That's fine with me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tempest T. Pot</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:57:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: R.E.M. Blatantly Rips Off Improv Everywhere</title><link>http://laughingsquid.com/rem-blatantly-rips-off-improv-everywhere/#comment-1811497</link><description>&lt;p&gt;J.C. - Improv Everywhere was not contacted in advance. I think this could have all been avoided if that were the case.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ezara - remhq took the video down to re-edit and will add a credit for Improv Everywhere then re-post.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Danger Ranger - Unfortunately it was not an April Fools Joke. I confirmed that before posting.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Scott Beale</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:12:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: R.E.M. Blatantly Rips Off Improv Everywhere</title><link>http://laughingsquid.com/rem-blatantly-rips-off-improv-everywhere/#comment-1811496</link><description>&lt;p&gt;07:45 PST, April 2  - It's been removed. &lt;br&gt;I assume that it was an April 1st joke?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Danger Ranger</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 10:51:06 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: R.E.M. Blatantly Rips Off Improv Everywhere</title><link>http://laughingsquid.com/rem-blatantly-rips-off-improv-everywhere/#comment-1811495</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Looks like the video has been taken down, so I can't see how blatant the rip off is.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But, personally, I'm not sure R.E.M. is better than that; the "Everybody Hurts" video 15 years ago was a pretty blatant rip off of Wim Wenders' "Wings of Desire".&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ezra Ball</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 09:50:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: R.E.M. Blatantly Rips Off Improv Everywhere</title><link>http://laughingsquid.com/rem-blatantly-rips-off-improv-everywhere/#comment-1811500</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hey Scott, love the blog. Yours is one of my favorites.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I'm no REM fanboy, but the band / label / etc. may have received permission to reenact the concept, but may not have been required to include the source of inspiration in the video.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This happened with the All American Rejects' video for "Dirty Little Secret." While the filmmakers used actual postcards from &lt;a href="http://PostSecret.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="PostSecret.com"&gt;PostSecret.com&lt;/a&gt; with permission from (and compensation to) PostSecret's  creator (which went to charity), the inspiration for video wasn't included in the video itself.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I have no idea if a similar "behind the curtain" agreement was struck between REM and Improv Everywhere, but I'm pointing out that possibility. The video has been pulled from YouTube at the time of this writing -- whether that's because of the issue you describe or something else, it's unclear.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I certainly hope the filmmakers approached Improv Everywhere, and that the group was compensated for their concept.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">J.C. Hutchins</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 08:16:11 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: R.E.M. Blatantly Rips Off Improv Everywhere</title><link>http://laughingsquid.com/rem-blatantly-rips-off-improv-everywhere/#comment-1811498</link><description>&lt;p&gt;No nod, no nothin'. Blatant is right. Very tacky.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;REM- you're better than that.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Larry Rubin</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:19:00 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: R.E.M. Blatantly Rips Off Improv Everywhere</title><link>http://laughingsquid.com/rem-blatantly-rips-off-improv-everywhere/#comment-1811499</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If you go to the YouTube page itself it says: &lt;br&gt;About This Video&lt;br&gt;Added: April 01, 2008&lt;br&gt;Credit to Improve Everywhere for the inspiration for this. Sometimes deceleration makes sense. (less)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Beatrice M</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:08:16 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>