<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Laughing Squid - Latest Comments in Flickr Adds New Stats Feature</title><link>http://laughingsquid.disqus.com/</link><description>a resource for art, culture and technology</description><atom:link href="https://laughingsquid.disqus.com/flickr_adds_new_stats_feature/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:37:53 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Flickr Adds New Stats Feature</title><link>http://laughingsquid.com/flickr-adds-new-stats-feature/#comment-1810182</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The stats are great, something I've wanted for a while.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; One tip is to click on &lt;a href="http://flickr.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="flickr.com"&gt;flickr.com&lt;/a&gt; under domains to see some really detailed info on how people are finding photos through sets and groups as well as contacts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; Another thing that is pretty clear is people aren't finding collections.  I don't have as much traffiic as you, but there is a similar huge gap between views of sets and collections.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt; It might help if there was some visual representation that a set was in a collection and a similar thing for individual photos.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Steve Rhodes</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 18:37:53 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>